• ePaper
  • Europe´s Third Way to Technological Sovereignty. A Critique

  • By Ekaitz Cancela , Aitor Jiménez | 25 Apr 22 | Posted under: USA , China , European Union , Information Society
  • The European Union is witnessing a radical epistemic and societal change. The way we communicate, produce, socialise, and even govern, are being shaped by privately owned digital infrastructures.

    People in places as different as Spain and Poland are funneled through the same private conducts to culture, jobs and potential romantic partners. An ultralibertarian version of capitalism has been able to own the public sphere. Data, an abstract, inasible and imprecise concept, has be come key to understanding the conditions enabling the (re)production of capital.

    Recently, discourses on European digital sovereignty have gained momentum. Faced with an enormous pressure from franco-German national industries to ad vance their interests in the digital economy in the face of Trump's protectionist offensive and the enveloping opening of Xi Jinping, the EU is trying to impose an idea that takes us back to his foundational scenario: the promotion of greater competition will bring about the flourishing of European giants.

    We propose instead a Democratic Technological Development not shaped by market rules, but inspired by the ideas of solidarity, cooperation and wealth distribution. A community centered technological development built on the basis od democratic digital infrastructures. A fair ecosystem where vast networks of cooperatives can flourish. A space where the logic underpinning digital services is that of the common well-being, the respect for fundamental human rights, and not the profits of shareholders. A space where concepts such as digital economy does not equate with disinformation, data and resource extractivism or algorithmic discrimination.

    First of all, new technological tools can be an opportunity to advance in the processes of democratisation and transparency that institutions require.
    Second, the foundation of a digital economy must be built on public infrastructure and it must be ensured that citizens can take advantage of its full potential.
    Third, the only way to regain democratic control of industrial platforms is the collective ownership of these infrastructures by creative agents, who must have the capacity to organise themselves at the political level to design and create institutions capable of socialising the benefits of human action on nature.

    Please find the ePaper on the right/below (mobile version) in 'Documents' (English, PDF).

    Table of contents

    Introduction: A Clash between models: USA, China, and the European Union
    Silicon Valley doctrine
    Adam Smith in Beijing? Chinese’s path to digital capitalism
    European Union, the road to the colony

    Part I: Europe’s Third Way
    Building a new old Single Market
    The Ordoliberal Dogmas of the Juncker Strategy: The Limits of Antitrust Policy
    Tax on digital services, pillars of a new social order?
    The limited political dimension of privacy regulation
    European Artificial Intelligence Strategy, Digital Sovereignty or Empty Words?
    Europe’s Battle for Discourse

    Part II: The Franco-German axis

    Macron’s Start-up Nation
    The hype of the German Industry 4.0

    Part III: The Gaia-X project, fake technological sovereignty
    What to do?


Related articles