On invitation only!
The economic crisis’ outbreak in 2007-2008 stipulated the EU’s strategy for the forthcoming years in political, economic, ideological and social terms. Although the neoliberal policies were already delineated by the Lisbon treaty, the rigid implementation of austerity in the course of the crisis drove the process of integration rapidly to an impasse. Clearly the EU leaders used crisis as an opportunity for the development of the Union towards austerity and authoritarianism. The imbalances between the member- states are increasing. Objectively the crisis has divided the European Union into a hard core of leading countries with export orientated economies and a periphery where unemployment rates remain high and precarious labour conditions prevail. Concepts of reforming the European Union recently tabled by the commission although presented in the form of different scenarios (the so called “White Book”) aim at further strengthening the authoritarian governance of the European Union.
The crisis of political representation in the member-states as well as the increasingly authoritarian character that are being materialised in the European Union has provoked a nationalist wave all across Europe which questions European integration as such.
Since the 90s the radical Left has established itself as a real force on the European scene. However, despite the electoral progress radical Left parties have made in some countries, particularly in the European South the balance of forces remains unfavourable.
This situation poses three fundamental questions to the European Left:
1. How can the European Left overcome the far right reinvigorated by the political crisis in several countries and in the Europe?
2. What are the possible strategies of changing Europe? Can the European Union be transformed on the basis of the existing treaties? And if not what follows from this strategically?
3. Which would be the criteria for a Left alternative plan for Europe and do these criteria contribute also to the discussion regarding the unity of the progressive forces?
In parallel, the concept of national sovereignty and self-determination of the member states within the strategic goal of a transnational democracy remains untouched by the radical left forces. Most of the times, the political actors try to answer to this question in a distorted way by placing themselves to the false dilemma of a “Yes” or “No” to the EU. Such a dilemma is based on the idea that sovereignty and democracy are reciprocally excluded. A couple of questions that must be tackled: What does sovereignty really mean in an economically and politically globalized world? Can the return to national sovereignty be a key element of the Left’s strategic project?
Organisers of the seminar: transform! europe, Rosa Luxemburg Foundation, Society for European dialogue – SPED (Czech Republic)
09.00 - 09.30 Welcome by Angelina Giannopoulou, Facilitator of transform! Europe
09.30 - 11.00 The Electoral cycle in 2017: Netherlands, France, UK, Germany
11.00-11.15 Coffee break
11.15-12.35 The economic landscape in Europe
12.35-13.30 Lunch break
13.30-14.50 The political mosaic in the European South
14.50-16.20 An alternative plan for Europe: Tracing the criteria, designing the conditions, finding the allies for a radical left strategy. A dialogue among the Party of the European Left, the GUE/NGL, Plan B platform, “Building bridges” initiative, actors from the movements
16.20-16.35 Coffee Break
16.35-17.20 Turkish politics and the EU-Turkey relation
17.20-18.40 Political processes in the Central-Eastern European region
09.00-09.55 The fate of the far right and the right - populist parties in Europe
09.55-10.10 Coffee Break
10.10-10.50 Does the EU a priori destabilise the Left?
10.50-12.20 Transforming the European Union: A discussion on the refoundation of the treaties and the institutions
12.20-12.35 Coffee Break
12.35-14.00 Theoretical approaches on transnational experiences of integration
14.00-14.45 Lunch Break
14.45-16.15 A Europe of different speeds: Concepts of regional cooperation
16.15-17.15 Conclusions, follow up, discussion: A roadmap for the future towards the ‘Marseille’ Forum and the 2019 European Elections